Skip to content

FeatureDevelopment pipeline

Development pipelineWhitemarsh TownshipSketch plan

A Bethlehem Pike sketch plan in Whitemarsh shows 162 units under a proposed overlay that allows 32 units an acre

A developer's sketch for 431-461 Bethlehem Pike, near Fort Washington Station, shows 162 homes in two buildings of 56 and 65 feet, with 6,000 square feet of ground-floor retail. It depends on a zoning overlay that still needs a vote of the Board of Supervisors.

Project
431-461 Bethlehem Pike, Whitemarsh Township
Dwelling units in the sketch
162in two buildings, with 6,000 sq ft of retail
Draft TDO-3 density
32units per gross acre
Permit high since 1980
158units, in 2005
Units permitted in 2024
74all single-family
Stage
Tentative sketch plan, on the Planning Commission agenda of October 13, 2026

The sketch's two buildings rise 56 and 65 feet, the two height limits in the draft overlay

010203040506070FT65 FT: OVERLAY MAXIMUM, 5 STORIES56 FT: MAXIMUM WITHIN 100 FT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYMIXED-USEON THE PIKE56 FT62 UNITSRETAIL 6,000 SQ FTMULTIFAMILYINSIDE THE SITE65 FT100 UNITS43 PARKING SPACESSURFACE LOTS169 SPACESBETHLEHEM PIKEULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAYHEIGHTS TO SCALE. WIDTHS IN PROPORTION TO DWELLING UNITS. POSITIONS SCHEMATIC. 010203040506070FT65 FT OVERLAY LIMIT56 FT LIMIT BY THE ROADMIXED-USEON THE PIKE56 FT62 UNITSRETAIL6,000 SQ FTMULTIFAMILYINSIDE THE SITE65 FT100 UNITS43 PARKINGSPACES INSIDERIGHT-OF-WAYPIKE
Building heights, dwelling units, retail floor area and parking as the Montgomery County Planning Commission's review of September 24, 2026 describes the sketch plan. Height limits from the draft TDO-3 ordinance. Both are in the Planning Commission packet for October 13, 2026, checked October 24, 2026.

A developer's sketch plan for 431-461 Bethlehem Pike in Whitemarsh Township, near Fort Washington Station, shows 162 dwelling units in two buildings and 6,000 square feet of ground-floor retail. The plan depends on a zoning text amendment the developer, the Hankin Group, submitted with it. The amendment would create a Transit-Friendly Design Overlay 3, or TDO-3, that allows up to 32 units per gross acre in the township's VC-1 Village Commercial District.

Both items were on the agenda of the Whitemarsh Planning Commission's October 13, 2026 meeting, and the meeting packet holds the draft ordinance, the plan's design manual, a review by the Montgomery County Planning Commission dated September 24 and a review by the township engineer dated October 5.

Two buildings would hold 162 units, with 212 parking spaces

The county review describes the program. A 56-foot mixed-use building along Bethlehem Pike would hold 62 units over the retail space. A 65-foot multifamily building inside the site would hold 100 units and 43 internal parking spaces, and surface lots would add 169 more. Several existing buildings would be demolished. The design manual says Wissahickon Hall, an office building from around 1890, and a two-story stone house stay.

The plan's 212 parking spaces are mostly in surface lots, 169 of them

The tentative sketch plan for 431-461 Bethlehem Pike
ElementHeightDwelling unitsRetail (sq ft)Parking spaces
Mixed-use building on Bethlehem Pike56 ft626,000
Multifamily building inside the site65 ft100043
Surface parking lots169
Total1626,000212
The tentative sketch plan for 431-461 Bethlehem Pike, as the Montgomery County Planning Commission describes it in its review of September 24, 2026. Planning Commission packet, checked October 24, 2026.

The 162 units would top 2005, the township's high since 1980, at 158

Whitemarsh authorized 74 new housing units in 2024, all single-family, according to the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission's tables of Census building permit data. The township's highest year in the series, which starts in 1980, was 2005, with 158 units.

Whitemarsh has authorized no more than 158 housing units in a year

200020042008201220162020202404080120160UNITS162 UNITSSKETCH PLAN2005, THE HIGH SINCE 1980158 UNITS, 130 OF THEM IN BUILDINGS OF 5+202474 UNITS, ALL SINGLE-FAMILYSINGLE-FAMILYBUILDINGS OF 5 OR MORE UNITSTHE SKETCH PLAN 200020082016202404080120160UNITS1622005: 158THE HIGH2024: 74ALL SINGLESINGLE-FAMILY5 OR MORE UNITSTHE SKETCH PLAN, 162 UNITS
New private housing units authorized by building permits, Whitemarsh Township, 2000 to 2024, by type of building. The table lists no units in buildings of 2 to 4 units in these years. DVRPC compiles the figures from the Census Bureau's Building Permits Survey, and the table runs through 2024. DVRPC Housing Permits, checked October 24, 2026.

Permits for units in buildings of five or more came to 72 across 2015 through 2024, and none were issued from 2021 through 2024. The 162 units in the sketch would exceed any single year since 1980, though a project this size could draw its permits over more than one year.

The draft overlay allows 32 units an acre, where the Village Commercial districts allow 8

The draft ordinance makes the overlay available by conditional use, an approval the township grants case by case against standards the ordinance lists. A property needs at least 3 acres, public water and sewer, and some land within 1,000 feet of a SEPTA train station or bus stop. The project has to restore an environmentally distressed area at the applicant's cost, at least 0.5 acre or 10% of the lot, whichever is larger, and every building has to be designed to LEED Silver, a level in the U.S. Green Building Council's rating system for green buildings, with an application for certification.

The overlay's 32 units an acre compares with 8 in the Village Commercial districts today

0102030UNITS PER ACREVILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS8WITH SHARED DRIVEWAY ACCESSCHANGE BACKED SEPTEMBER 810DRAFT TDO-3 OVERLAYPER GROSS ACRE32 0102030UNITS PER ACREVILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS8WITH SHARED DRIVEWAY ACCESS10DRAFT TDO-3 OVERLAY32
Maximum residential density, dwelling units per acre. The Village Commercial figures come from the minutes of the Planning Commission's September 8, 2026 meeting; the overlay figure from the draft TDO-3 ordinance. Both are in the October 13, 2026 packet.

Buildings could rise to five stories and 65 feet, or four stories and 56 feet within 100 feet of the ultimate right-of-way, the line set aside for future road widening. Parking starts at one space per unit and three per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential floor area, and a lot may hold no more than 110% of that minimum without a parking demand analysis. For comparison, residential density in the Village Commercial districts is 8 units per acre, according to the minutes of the commission's September 8 meeting, where members backed a separate change that would allow 10 for properties that share driveway access.

The county backs the amendment, and the township engineer lists 122 comments

The county planning commission's letter finds the amendment and sketch generally consistent with the township's comprehensive plan and with the county's, which maps the site as a village center inside a rail station walkshed, the area within half a mile of a station. The commission says it generally supports the proposed amendments and lists concerns for the township and the applicant to weigh before adoption.

They include definitions of environmental restoration that it calls vague, and the LEED clause, which, the commission says, does not appear to require that a building end up certified, only that it be designed to Silver and that the applicant apply. It suggests precertification or early documentation from the Green Building Council.

On the sketch, it asks how the trail along the property line would reach the station, which may need coordination with SEPTA, and recommends a trail at least 10 feet wide, curb ramps that meet federal right-of-way accessibility guidelines, and moving parking spaces that sit at the site entrances.

The township engineer's letter runs to 122 numbered comments, many of them preliminary plan requirements given as guidance. It points out that the draft overlay sets no open space minimum of its own, so the plan must show it meets the VC-1 standard. It also lists the permits and fees that follow the plan.

The engineer's letter names a PennDOT permit, a DEP stormwater permit and four studies for the preliminary plan

Permits, fees and studies named in the township engineer's review of October 5, 2026
ItemWhat the township engineer's letter says
Traffic impact fee$2,825 per anticipated peak-hour trip in the North Transportation Service Area
Bethlehem Pike workA PennDOT Highway Occupancy Permit for work in the right-of-way of Bethlehem Pike (SR 2018)
StormwaterA DEP NPDES permit because the limit of disturbance appears to exceed one acre
Fill near waterNo fill in watercourses or floodways or on wetlands unless the Army Corps of Engineers and DEP permit it and the township approves
Steep slopesDisturbance limited to 30% of slopes between 15% and 25% and 15% of slopes of 25% or more
Park land10% of the site area for park or recreation use or a fee in lieu or a mix of both
Preliminary plan studiesSewer and water feasibility; groundwater protection and replenishment; erosion and sedimentation control; traffic impact
Permits, fees and studies named in the township engineer's review of October 5, 2026, in the October 13, 2026 Planning Commission packet.

The traffic impact fee depends on a count the plan does not yet contain, since the traffic study comes with the preliminary plan. The table below shows how the fee scales, with trip counts chosen only as an example.

At $2,825 a trip, an example of 100 peak-hour trips gives a $282,500 fee

Example: the Whitemarsh traffic impact fee at three trip counts
Peak-hour trips (example)Fee per tripTraffic impact feeFee drawn to scale
50$2,825$141,250
100$2,825$282,500
150$2,825$423,750
Example only: the trip counts are round numbers chosen for illustration, at the rate of $2,825 per anticipated peak-hour trip in the North Transportation Service Area that the township engineer's review gives. October 13, 2026 packet.

What this means for contractors

The plan describes work across several trades: demolition, floodplain and wetland restoration along Sandy Run, woodland and meadow planting over much of the southern part of the site, a trail tied to the Cross County Trail, road and curb work in Bethlehem Pike under a PennDOT permit, and two buildings of 56 and 65 feet. Site and civil firms would work under the erosion and sedimentation plan and the DEP stormwater permit the engineer names.

Trade contractors bidding the buildings should ask the general contractor which LEED credits the project is pursuing and what documentation each scope must supply, since the draft ties the zoning approval to a Silver design.

The sketch is at its first stage of review, and the ordinance still needs a vote

The project is at its first stage of review. A sketch plan is not binding, the ordinance needs a vote of the Board of Supervisors, and the conditional use and the preliminary and final land development plans come after that.

  1. NowSketch planPlanning Commission agenda, October 13, 2026. Not binding.
  2. NextOrdinance voteThe Board of Supervisors decides on the overlay.
  3. ThenConditional useApproval against the ordinance's standards.
  4. ThenPreliminary planThe traffic study comes with it.
  5. LastFinal planFinal land development plan.

Agendas and packets for the Planning Commission and the supervisors are posted in the township's Agenda Center. The tentative agenda for the commission's November 10 meeting lists a sketch plan for 50 homes, 40 singles and 10 twins, at Karamoor Farm on East Skippack Pike. For how the county's permit figures are compiled, see the guide to local construction market data.

Caveats

The unit counts, heights and parking come from a tentative sketch and can change at every step. The Planning Commission's action on October 13 could not be verified, because its minutes were not yet posted when this was checked on October 24. Its votes are recommendations; the Board of Supervisors decides on the ordinance, and the county's review is advisory. The DVRPC permit table ends with 2024 and counts units authorized by permit.

Housing units authorized in Whitemarsh by type of building, 2000 to 2024

Housing units authorized in Whitemarsh Township by type of building, 2000 to 2024
YearSingle-family2 to 4 units5 or more unitsTotal unitsTotal drawn to scale
2000220022
2001180018
2002910091
2003720072
2004730073
2005280130158
200627099126
2007190104123
2008200020
2009160016
2010120012
20112002
20120000
2013706269
201460511
20155001060
2016660066
201710300103
201881040121
201910500105
20205902281
20212002
2022110011
2023380038
2024740074
New private housing units authorized by building permits. DVRPC Housing Permits, from the Census Bureau's Building Permits Survey, checked October 24, 2026. Download the data (CSV).